---
layout: farshid_default
title: "2D vs 3D Mapping for Moving Objects"
permalink: /notes/pubs/papers/2d-3d-mapping/
description: "Comparison of 2D and 3D mapping approaches for environment movement detection."
---

Comparison of 2D and 3D mapping approaches for environment movement detection.

tags: [3d-mapping, object-detection, computer-vision, robotics]
hashtags: "#3dmapping #objectdetection #cv #robotics"

My_Conference_Paper_2D_versus_3D_Map_for_Environment_Movement_Objects

https://www.pirahansiah.com/notes/pubs/papers/conference-paper_2D_versus_3D_Map_for_Environment_Movement_Objects

[spotify](https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pirahansiah/episodes/My-Paper-2D-versus-3D-Map-for-Environment-Movement-Objects-e2pruii )

[PDF Download My Conference Paper]( http://www.ftsm.ukm.my/cait2012/images/Program%20Schedule%20CAIT2012.pdf )

  ![My Conference Paper  My_Conference_Paper_2D_versus_3D_Map_for_Environment_Movement_Objects ](/farshid/content/2d-3d-map-movement.png)

  <img src="/farshid/content/2d-3d-map-movement.png" alt="My Conference Paper: My_Conference_Paper_2D_versus_3D_Map_for_Environment_Movement_Objects "  style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;">

# Paper: 2D versus 3D Map for Environment Movement Objects

## 1. Introduction
   - **Main Focus**: The use of 2D vs. 3D mapping in tracking environmental movement objects.
   - **Key Applications**:
     - Autonomous systems
     - Robotics
   - **Challenges**:
     - Object rotation issues in 2D mapping
     - Scaling problems in 2D environments

## 2. Materials and Methods
   - **3D Mapping Algorithms**:
     - Introduces algorithms that manage:
       - Scale
       - Position
       - Orientation
   - **Data Capture**:
     - Details the **camera** and **sensor systems** used to capture movement data.

## 3. Experiments and Discussions
   - **System Performance Comparison**:
     - Evaluates **2D vs. 3D mapping systems** based on:
       - Accuracy
       - Adaptability to different conditions
     - Results indicate significant **improvement in accuracy** with the 3D system.
   - **Test Conditions**:
     - Different test scenarios were designed to assess:
       - Real-world movement
       - Environmental challenges

## 4. Conclusion
   - **Key Findings**:
     - 3D mapping shows **superior performance** in real-world tracking compared to 2D.
     - Better handling of environmental challenges such as rotation and scaling.

## 5. Table of Comparison
   - **Comparison Parameters**:
     - Accuracy rates
     - Time efficiency
   - **Methods Evaluated**:
     - 2D Mapping
     - 3D Mapping
     - Hybrid approaches